 |
Founding Brothers |

featured
in Macworld,
one of the 5
best history sites on the web
|
|
|
Founding
Brothers: The Revolutionary Generation by
Joseph J. Ellis
Book
Description
An
illuminating study of the intertwined lives
of the founders of the American republic--John
Adams, Aaron Burr, Benjamin Franklin, Alexander
Hamilton, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, and
George Washington.
During
the 1790s, which Ellis calls the most decisive
decade in our nation's history, the greatest
statesmen of their generation--and perhaps
any--came together to define the new republic
and direct its course for the coming centuries.
Ellis focuses on six discrete moments that
exemplify the most crucial issues facing
the fragile new nation: Burr and Hamilton's
deadly duel, and what may have really happened;
Hamilton, Jefferson, and Madison's secret
dinner, during which the seat of the permanent
capital was determined in exchange for
passage of Hamilton's financial plan; Franklin's
petition to end the "peculiar institution" of
slavery--his last public act--and Madison's
efforts to quash it; Washington's precedent-setting
Farewell Address, announcing his retirement
from public office and offering his country
some final advice; Adams's difficult term
as Washington's successor and his alleged
scheme to pass the presidency on to his
son; and finally, Adams and Jefferson's
renewed correspondence at the end of their
lives, in which they compared their different
views of the Revolution and its legacy.
In
a lively and engaging narrative, Ellis recounts
the sometimes collaborative, sometimes archly
antagonistic interactions between these men,
and shows us the private characters behind the
public personas: Adams, the ever-combative iconoclast,
whose closest political collaborator was his
wife, Abigail; Burr, crafty, smooth, and one
of the most despised public figures of his time;
Hamilton, whose audacious manner and deep economic
savvy masked his humble origins; Jefferson,
renowned for his eloquence, but so reclusive
and taciturn that he rarely spoke more than
a few sentences in public; Madison, small, sickly,
and paralyzingly shy, yet one of the most effective
debaters of his generation; and the stiffly
formal Washington, the ultimate realist, larger-than-life,
and America's only truly indispensable figure.
Ellis
argues that the checks and balances that permitted
the infant American republic to endure were
not primarily legal, constitutional, or institutional,
but intensely personal, rooted in the dynamic
interaction of leaders with quite different
visions and values. Revisiting the old-fashioned
idea that character matters, Founding Brothers
informs our understanding of American politics--then
and now--and gives us a new perspective on the
unpredictable forces that shape history.
About
the Author
Joseph
J. Ellis is the author of several books of American
history, among them Passionate Sage: The Character
and Legacy of John Adams and American Sphinx:
The Character of Thomas Jefferson, which won
the 1997 National Book Award. He was educated
at the College of William and Mary and Yale
University and lives in Amherst, Massachusetts,
with his wife, Ellen, and three sons. |
Reviews
1st
Chapter Book
Description Author
Buy
Editorial
Reviews
From
Booklist
An outstanding
biographer of Jefferson (American Sphinx,
1997), Ellis takes up new lines in this
exploration of the
"gestative" 1790s.
He tailors six stories about political
episodes that highlight a founder's
character, convictions, and actions.
Ellis' purpose
in this storytelling is to underscore
how vulnerable to dissolution the founders
felt their creation to be, thereby explaining
the controversies
(such as the compromises with slavery)
that to this day excite not just scholarly
but general debate about what the Declaration
and Constitution achieved.
For
example, Ben Franklin's last public act,
signing a ban-the-slave-trade petition
to the First Congress in 1790, provoked
a floor argument so fierce about abolition
it raised the spectra of disunion; Washington
expressed relief with Congress' resolution
to do nothing and debate no more about
the matter. Ellis recounts equally fluidly
and astutely such episodes as Hamilton's
death; the bargain that sited the capital
on the Potomac; Washington's Farewell
Address; and the germination of parties.
Palpably steeped in a career's worth of
immersion in the early republic, Ellis'
essays are angled, fascinating, and perfect
for general-interest readers. Gilbert
Taylor
Copyright © American Library Association.
All rights reserved
Amazon.com's
Best of 2001
In retrospect, it seems as if the American
Revolution was inevitable. But was it?
In Founding Brothers, Joseph J. Ellis
reveals that many of those truths we hold
to be self-evident were actually fiercely
contested in the early days of the republic.
Ellis
focuses on six crucial moments
in the life of the new nation,
including a secret dinner at which
the seat of the nation's capital
was determined--in exchange for
support of Hamilton's financial
plan; Washington's precedent-setting
Farewell Address; and the Hamilton
and Burr duel. Most interesting,
perhaps, is the debate (still dividing
scholars today) over the meaning
of the Revolution. In a fascinating
chapter on the renewed friendship
between John Adams and Thomas Jefferson
at the end of their lives, Ellis
points out the fundamental differences
between the Republicans, who saw
the Revolution as a liberating
act and hold the Declaration of
Independence most sacred, and the
Federalists, who saw the revolution
as a step in the building of American
nationhood and hold the Constitution
most dear. Throughout the text,
Ellis explains the personal, face-to-face
nature of early American politics--and
notes that the members of the revolutionary
generation were conscious of the
fact that they were establishing
precedents on which future generations
would rely. In
Founding Brothers, Ellis (whose American
Sphinx won the National Book Award for
nonfiction in 1997) has written an elegant
and engaging narrative, sure to become
a classic. Highly recommended. --Sunny
Delaney From
Library Journal
Having considered Thomas Jefferson
in his National Book Award winner,
American Sphinx, Ellis expands his
horizons to include Jefferson's "brothers," e.g.,
Washington, Madison, and Burr.
Copyright 2000 Reed Business Information,
Inc. From
the Back Cover
“A splendid book–humane, learned,
written with flair and radiant with a
calm intelligence and wit.”–The
New York Times Book Review “Lively
and illuminating…leaves the reader
with a visceral sense of a formative era
in American life.”–The
New York Times “Masterful….
Fascinating…. Ellis is an elegant
stylist…. [He] captures the passion
the founders brought to the revolutionary
project…. [A] very fine book.”–Chicago
Tribune “Learned,
exceedingly well-written, and perceptive.”–The
Oregonian “Lucid….
Ellis has such command of the subject
matter that it feels fresh, particularly
as he segues from psychological to political,
even to physical analysis…. Ellis’s
storytelling helps us more fully hear
the Brothers’ voices.”–Business
Week “Splendid….
Revealing…. An extraordinary book.
Its insightful conclusions rest on extensive
research, and its author’s writing
is vigorous and lucid.”–St.
Louis Post-Dispatch “Vivid
and unforgettable . . . [an] enduring
achievement.” –The Boston
Globe “Founding
Brothers is a wonderful book, one of the
best . . . on the Founders ever written.
. . . Ellis has established himself as
the Founders’ historian for our
time.” –Gordon S. Wood,
The New York Review of Books
|
|
Excerpt
Chapter
1: The Generation No
event in American history which was so improbable
at the time has seemed so inevitable in
retrospect as the American Revolution.
On the inevitability side, it is true there
were voices back then urging prospective
patriots to regard American independence
as an early version of manifest destiny.
Tom Paine, for example, claimed that it
was simply a matter of common sense that
an island could not rule a continent. And
Thomas Jefferson's lyrical rendering of
the reasons for the entire revolutionary
enterprise emphasized the self-evident
character of the principles at stake. Several
other prominent American revolutionaries
also talked as if they were actors in a
historical drama whose script had already
been written by the gods. In his old age,
John Adams recalled his youthful intimations
of the providential forces at work: "There is nothing . . .
more ancient in my memory," he wrote in
1807, "than the observation that arts,
sciences, and empire had always traveled westward.
And in conversation it was always added, since
I was a child, that their next leap would be
over the Atlantic into America." Adams
instructed his beloved Abigail to start saving
all his letters even before the outbreak of
the war for independence. Then in June of 1776,
he purchased "a Folio Book" to preserve
copies of his entire correspondence in order
to record, as he put it, "the great Events
which are passed, and those greater which are
rapidly advancing." Of course we tend to
remember only the prophets who turn out to be
right, but there does seem to have been a broadly
shared sense within the revolutionary generation
that they were "present at the creation." These
early premonitions of American destiny have
been reinforced and locked into our collective
memory by the subsequent triumph of the political
ideals the American Revolution first announced,
as Jefferson so nicely put it, "to a
candid world." Throughout Asia, Africa, and Latin
America, former colonies of European powers
have won their independence with such predictable
regularity that colonial status has become an
exotic vestige of bygone days, a mere way station
for emerging nations. The republican experiment
launched so boldly by the revolutionary generation
in America encountered entrenched opposition
in the two centuries that followed, but it thoroughly
vanquished the monarchical dynasties of the
nineteenth century and then the totalitarian
despotisms of the twentieth, just as Jefferson
predicted it would. Though it seems somewhat
extreme to declare, as one contemporary political
philosopher has phrased it, that "the end
of history" is now at hand, it is true
that all alternative forms of political organization
appear to be fighting a futile rear-guard
action against the liberal institutions and
ideas first established in the United States
in the late eighteenth century. At least
it seems safe to say that some form of representative
government based on the principle of popular
sovereignty and some form of market economy
fueled by the energies of individual citizens
have become the commonly accepted ingredients
for national success throughout the world.
These legacies are so familiar to us, we
are so accustomed to taking their success
for granted, that the era in which they were
born cannot help but be remembered as a land
of foregone conclusions. Despite
the confident and providential statements
of leaders like Paine, Jefferson, and
Adams, the conclusions that look so foregone
to us had yet to congeal for them. The
old adage applies: Men make history,
and the leading members of the revolutionary
generation realized they were doing so,
but they can never know the history they
are making. We can look back and make
the era of the American Revolution a
center point, then scan the terrain upstream
and downstream, but they can only know
what is downstream. An anecdote that
Benjamin Rush, the Philadelphia physician
and signer of the Declaration of Independence,
liked to tell in his old age makes the
point memorably. On July 4, 1776, just
after the Continental Congress had finished
making its revisions of the Declaration
and sent it off to the printer for publication,
Rush overheard a conversation between
Benjamin Harrison of Virginia and Elbridge
Gerry of Massachusetts: "I shall have a
great advantage over you, Mr. Gerry," said
Harrison, "when we are all hung for what
we are now doing. From the size and weight of
my body I shall die in a few minutes, but from
the lightness of your body you will dance in
the air an hour or two before you are dead."
Rush recalled that the comment "procured
a transient smile, but it was soon succeeded
by the solemnity with which the whole business
was conducted."
|
|
|
|
|