The Americans drew a distinction
between an internal tax on the colonists (the stamp act) and an external tax
on the trade of the colonies. Patrick
Henry offered several anti-stamp act resolutions in the House
of Burgesses in Virginia, most of which were passed. Virginia
declared that it would not pay taxes which had not been approved
by its legislature. The royal
governor of Virginia, appointed by the King of Britain, did not approve the resolutions and dissolved
the House of Burgesses, precipitating a crisis.
Newspapers
attempted to avoid the requirements of the act by issuing
sheets without the masthead and other characteristics of a
newspaper. In this way they were able to continue publishiing
without risk of prosecution for their resistance to the act.
One such paper was the Pennsylvania
Gazette. On October 31, 1765 the publishers announced
the suspension of the Gazette in opposition to the provisions
of the Stamp Act which required that it be printed on imported,
stamped paper.
In
addition to rhetoric, the colonists waged a campaign which
included evasion and tarring
and feathering to fight the tax and intimidate
the tax collectors. No stamp commissioner or tax collector
was actually tarred and feathered but by November 1, 1765,
the day the Stamp Act tax went into effect, there were no
stamp commissioners left in the colonies to collect it.
Benjamin
Franklin was a colonial agent in London at the
time and testified before Parliament about the colonies' attitude
toward the tax. They were trying to understand the colonists'
strong feeling against the tax. Franklin testified:
I
never heard any objection to the right of laying duties
to regulate
commerce; but a right to lay internal taxes was never supposed
to be in
Parliament, as we are not represented there. . . .
The
tax was repealed in 1766 after Franklin's testimony, but it was not the end of the taxation issue.
|